10 maj 2013 kl. 17:40 skrev Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>: > On May 10, 2013, at 5:14 AM, Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This draft only talks about "Mail user agents" but as far as I see it it >> applies to SIP user agents as well. > > Nope, it only applies to MUAs. > >> One difference is that in a SIP uri, the username part is optional: >> >> sip:[email protected] >> sip:conference.example.com > > Yes, exactly. > >> Are both valid URI's. But that doesn't seem to make much of a difference. >> The records would become: >> >> MNUHE2LT._smimecert.example.com >> _smimecert.conference.example.com >> >> Would it make sense to incorporate SIP into this draft? > > I don't think so. It would be better to do that as a separate document with > separate considerations for the SIP protocol.
Ok. Can the "_smimecert" tag be used for this as well or should this be exclusive for S/MIME-Email? /O _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
