This version should address all the comments received and accepted during the
WGLC.
There is one issue that is uncertain in my mind i.e.
PKIX-CA vs PKIX-TA
I kept the draft using PKIX-CA
pending chairs or WG telling me otherwise.
Olafur
On Oct 18, 2013, at 2:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities
> Working Group of the IETF.
>
> Title : Adding acronyms to simplify DANE conversations
> Author(s) : Olafur Gudmundsson
> Filename : draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-01.txt
> Pages : 5
> Date : 2013-10-18
>
> Abstract:
> Experience has show that people get confused using the three numeric
> fields the TLSA record. This document specifies descriptive acronyms
> for the three numeric fields in the TLSA records.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
