On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:21:33PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> I think the value of this effort will be marginal at best. There >> are I think too many corner cases to make the "all" value practically >> reliable. There's not much point in "partial" or "none". > > Yep. Let me add different cryptographic systems to this list. How about > OpenPGP messages? How about Mixmaster or any other system which might become > relevant in the future?
Definitely not objectionable. Perhaps instead of "smime=" changed to "signed=" ? That makes it technology neutral. Scott > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
