-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/6/13 7:21 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > Hi! > > Earlier this year I published this draft about SIP and Dane: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johansson-dane-sip-00 > > I know it is not something for this wg, but I've received almost > null feedback from the dispatch wg in the RAI area and I rather not > drop this, as I think it would be good for SIP to move forward with > DANE. > > Any advice or hints on what to do in order to get some progress?
Hej Olle, I agree that defining this usage would be good. Matt Miller and I have been doing the same for XMPP, and we'll also be updating the dane-srv I-D soon. I'll add your I-D to my list of documents to review. :-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSoiswAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pG4wP/2pQG7WdK7XogI2COkWSuvqT OTyk1scO3yVdcyyjH4G+lqWAWA+85jRIXT6/Xqlo4yU85KMqWBvikZhDUMYRCewm 94Ezk71g1YfSCPk1BTWWk5n7isbfrJuabV9xvUaHAykYDL5RU2Omvo3XvNj6ZGov u2W7kE/4oeMLVPt8rXdSZemKjoLK3utlh9bzXweiaY+EyRd0LW9VXBfpsBm8np+P r8DcGllLKApoz0KQrfherNcvSUH9dw1p8FSQgqZFghTDB1Dji6R7LG5s41zhdCgC Bd+h1xToNunI0JyErWb9tJ6fgnRKBEjHse1aXbW7353N2UAQ7xutY/tBzao9ofBg iCsfL+xnD464FIK6aw3WbrrvZt5rDN7Ljy+wsw86TB0kkm8xiHqNjtPND6WdVToX 8ry7K300Nv2kjo+piMWPDIMi+wKoiQx80ceejo2feMjzzQMHtTLWcZEdJF1KgYZj q3bJcue8pBbNhYr0Jmd+UVlR9iihmeRzZ2IgguovpMEVxeXwEtohiPrI8aL2nL4v b2usXK7GIRbgWFhydLy+jXpR/zMgGA7IkEIx/L2Vh7OlqsUY1BTD9c+AlVLKWi3s rTPAXmC8jWeKJDez/0iI0Au2Ec1cAU3mt5kRDFj6Sw+XZ9Pxz7VezBFSZyTqrr9b xIykS+MhloK/ESG+bOcp =YZb5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
