I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03.txt Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 1/15/2014 IETF LC End Date: 1/23/2014 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready with issues Major issues: None - it's a simple, clear and useful document. Minor issues: 1. In Section 2.3 the I-D recommends that the values in reference column for SHA-256 and SHA-512 refer to [RFC 6698] while the IANA Considerations section in RFC 6698 recommends and the registry entries in the TLSA Matching Types table at http://www.iana.org/assignments/dane-parameters/dane-parameters.xhtml point to [RFC 6234]. 2. As this I-D updates the registries with a column for acronyms, it seems more accurate that the reference columns of all tables mention both [RFC 6698] and [RFC XXXX] (this RFC) Nits/editorial comments: In the Introduction section: 'This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA record to add a column with acronym for each specified field' s/acronym/an acronym/
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
