On Feb 6, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> > Switching gears, was any consensus reached on the endoing of the > query label? A truncated HMAC seems to offer better usability than > base32. I think that the specification is in good shape, modulo > the query label encoding. I actually have a question on this: is there some reason we are talking about HMAC instead of just straight-up using a hashing function? iirc, hashing accomplishes the same goal (for us) w/o needing any secret material (projecting a variable length name to a fixed length label). I'm fully willing to believe that I might just be missing something. I mean this just as a simple clarification question. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
