On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please let us know if there is anything you'd like to add to the below... Yes, definitely. There needs to be discussion on whether DANE is for acquisition of key assocation material, for discovering services that use the keying material, for having assurance that a service that uses the keying material should be available, or some combination of these. The SMTP draft has a very different take on this than what the WG agreed on for RFC 6698. And, before someone replies to this heated topic, please start a new thread. It would be *really* useful for the London discussion if we have a focused discussion on the list first. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
