>>>>> "PH" == Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> writes:
JC>> The only real question is whether dane-srv and dane-smtp-with-dane JC>> should be published as two rfcs or combined into one? (I’m leaning JC>> towards two, numerically adjacent.) PH> With all due respect, there are other real questions, much more PH> significant than that one. Sorry. That paragraph does not express the tone for which I aimed. And I should have caught that fact before posting. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
