This may be an ignorant question, but why would DANE handle these? They barely make reference to DANE at all, and certainly not in a normative sense.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Jakob Schlyter <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 18 feb 2014, at 16:11, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and > >> draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage. > >> > >> These drafts are available here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wouters-dane-openpgp/ > >> and > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage/ > >> > >> > >> Please review these two draft to see if you think if they are suitable > >> for adoption by the DANE WG. > > > > Yes, please adopt. > > Great, thanks for all the feedback we have received so far. These > will be (briefly) discussed tomorrow at the f2f meeting, but feel free > to carry on providing feedback as well (those that haven't) > > W > > > > > > jakob > > > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
