On May 20, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Thanks, I'll whack that in.
> 
> I assume the WG don't want (or don't care about) external review?
> If there were some other SDO (e.g. IEEE, W3C etc) who you think
> might need to know then external review would be correct, but I
> don't think that applies. Correct me if that's wrong,
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
Not aware of any external party that we need review from 

        Olafur

> On 20/05/14 15:49, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>> 
>> Stephen, 
>> below is our draft charter please take it to the IESG. 
>> 
>>      Olafur & Warren
>> 
>> Current Status: Active
>> 
>> Chairs:
>>     Warren Kumari
>>     Olafur Gudmundsson
>> 
>> Security Area Advisor:
>>     Stephen Farrell
>> 
>> Description of Working Group:
>> 
>> Objective:
>> 
>>    The DANE WG will process documents that describe how to
>>    incorporate DANE and DANE-like functionality in protocols, and
>>    mechanisms to facilitate adoption of this functionality. The DANE
>>    working group will also assist other working groups with adding
>>    DANE functionality to their work. In addition the working group
>>    will monitor and provide guidance to operators and tool developers.
>>    When work on currently chartered documents is complete the WG
>>    may re-charter if sufficiently pressing new work is identified.
>>    DANE is not intended to be a long-lived catch-all WG
>>    for all PKI in DNS issues and so will generally not adopt new
>>    work items without re-chartering.
>> 
>> Problem Statement:
>> 
>>    The DANE working group has developed a framework for securely
>>    retrieving keying information from the DNS [RFC6698]. This
>>    framework allows secure storing and looking up server public key
>>    information in the DNS. This provides a binding between a domain
>>    name providing a particular service and the key that can be used
>>    to establish encrypted connection to that service.
>> 
>>    By requiring DNSSEC protection for the lookup of the public key
>>    information, DANE leverages the integrity protection provided by
>>    DNSSEC to enable secure discovery of keying information. Operators
>>    wanting to take advantage of DANE for their services must turn on
>>    DNSSEC signing on the zones used in finding the services. Using
>>    DNS this way, bindings of keys to domains are asserted by the entities 
>> that 
>>    operate the DNS for that domain, not by external entities. 
>> 
>>    The DANE mechanisms provide flexibility in how the keying
>>    information is presented. DANE supports both Certificates and raw
>>    keys, further more Certificates and raw keys can be either the full
>>    key or a hash of the key. 
>>    The group will work on documenting the different approaches to use
>>    DANE keying, and the security implication of each. In addition
>>    the WG may develop a framework(s) to facilitate the lookup "client" DANE 
>>    records for authorization/authentication purposes. 
>> 
>>    The group may also create documents that describe how protocol
>>    entities can discover and validate these bindings in the execution
>>    of specific applications. This work would be done in coordination
>>    with the IETF Working Groups responsible for the protocols. 
>> 
>>    The group may in addition encourage interoperability testing and document
>>    the results of such testing. 
>> 
>> Goals and Milestones:
>>  DONE - First WG draft of standards-track protocol for using DNS to 
>> associate hosts with keys for TLS and DTLS
>>  DONE - Protocol for using DNS to associate domain names with keys for TLS 
>> and DTLS to IESG
>>  Jun 2014 - Advance DANE SRV document to IESG
>>  Jun 2014 - Advance DANE SMTP document to IESG
>>  Aug 2014 - Advance DANE SMIME document to IESG
>>  Aug 2014 - Advance DANE OPENPGP document to IESG
>>  Sep 2014 - Advance DANE operational guidance/errata document to IESG
>>  Jan 2015 - Advance DANE security model document to IESG.
>>  May 2015 - Advance DANE IPSEC document to IESG
>>  ??? 2015 - Advance DANE reverse binding (server to client) document to IESG.
>>  Sep 2015 - Advance DANE RFC6698 and DANE SRV RFC to Internet Standard
>>  Nov 2015 - Recharter or close down
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to