>>>>> "WH" == Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> writes:
WH> Another option: put a note about it in the dane-ops draft, which was WH> discussed at the last WG meeting as potentially being more than an -ops WH> document in the first place (extending DANE not just defining WH> operational characteristics). That sounds like a valid compromise. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
