On Aug 26, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Rose, Scott wrote: > >> Noted - the requirements are for capabilities, so maybe "protocol" is a bad >> choice of words. This draft is to start to flesh out requirements and get >> the discussion going with the goal to improve the SMIMEA draft, or other >> drafts. > > So it is an smime-dane-usage draft? Similar to: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage-00 > > I'm not sure if this new document and that one should be merged or not. > There will be similar concerns but also very different concerns. >
Possibly, but it would require some work. Or else there would be a SMIMEA and SMIMEA-usage documents as the result. In effect, a mirror of the OPENPGPKEY and its usage document pair. Scott > Paul =================================== Scott Rose NIST [email protected] +1 301-975-8439 Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671 http://www.dnsops.gov/ =================================== _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
