On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:05 PM, "Rose, Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> > Questions: > > 1. is this requirement reasonable? I believe it is. > 2. (if reasonable): Is the strawman text adequate? Should another method be > used other than a naming convention such as a different RRTYPE or usage field? We have found this quite useful in our coding, fwiw. Eric
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
