Whoever starts using variant email addresses should publish records for it? As 
John said, clients shouldn't start guessing addressing schemes used by others

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 12, 2014, at 06:37, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 11 December 2014 at 19:51, Rose, Scott W. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Realized the other action item I was assigned to from the interim meeting 
>> was email canonicalization for SMIMEA.  I believe it stems from Viktor 
>> Dukhovni's email to the endymail list:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/current/msg00134.html
>> 
>> I was wondering if we can borrow a page from RFC 4034 Section 6.2 and 
>> include text in the draft Section 3, item 1 in the numbered list:
>> 
>>     1.   The user name (the "left-hand side" of the email address, called
>>       the "local-part" in the mail message format definition [RFC2822]
>>       and the "local part" in the specification for internationalized
>>       email [RFC6530]), is hashed using the SHA2-224 [RFC5754]
>>       algorithm (with the hash being represented in its hexadecimal
>>       representation, to become the left-most label in the prepared
>>       domain name.  This does not include the "@" character that
>>       separates the left and right sides of the email address.  The
>>       string that is used for the local part is a Unicode string
>>       encoded in UTF-8 **with all upper case letters converted to their
>>       corresponding lower case letters where appropriate.**
>> 
>> 
>> The text between the '**' is new.  The goal is to prevent a situation when 
>> the email address is "[email protected]" and the SMIMEA is created using 
>> "jrandom" as the user name.   Would this be enough, or are there scripts 
>> where this would result in different or potentially conflicting owner names?
> 
> Speaking of canonicalisation:
> 
> 1. What about X+Y@Z - for almost all MTAs, this is the same as X@Z.
> 
> 2. What about GMail's [email protected] == [email protected] ==
> [email protected] == [email protected]?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to