On 20.2.2015 21:30, Warren Kumari wrote: > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
IMHO current version *should be rejected* because further clarification to keyring format is needed. See previous discussion on http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg07227.html As I already said, I believe that -01 version does not define an interoperable standard. The main problem is that http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-01#section-2.1 2.1. The OPENPGPKEY RDATA component The RDATA (or RHS) of an OPENPGPKEY Resource Record contains a single value consisting of a [RFC4880] formatted OpenPGP public keyring. references http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-3.6 3.6. Keyrings A keyring is a collection of one or more keys in a file or database. Traditionally, a keyring is simply a sequential list of keys, but may be any suitable database. It is beyond the scope of this standard to discuss the details of keyrings or other databases. and this definitely is not a definition you could use for implementation. Current format of records can stay as is but it has to be clearly documented so we do not rely on current GPG implementation. 'It is beyond the scope of this standard to discuss the details of keyrings or other databases.' is simply not sufficient. -- Petr Spacek @ Red Hat _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
