JL>> As I've said before, the reality that mail systems do fuzzy JL>> matching on incoming addresses, but not in a way that is at JL>> all consistent, is a big problem.
PW> It is such a big problem that we should not even mention it in PW> the document? I have to agree with Paul on this issue; Section 3.1 does not hurt the draft and should not prevent its publication as an RFC. I'm not as certain whether the language is ideal, and a separate followup document further discussing the issue is not a bad idea. But there is nothing wrong with this document noting the issue's existance. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
