On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:37 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > Publish the thing as experimental and be done with it.
The proposals are no more "experimental" than TLSA is. Further, they don't follow the guidelines from the IETF process for what is called "experimental" (RFC 2026, section 4.2.1) any more than over half of the RFCs produced by WGs these days. These are standards-track proposals that, like a large percentage of standards-track RFCs, might or might not garner much deployment. --Paul Hoffman P.S. And, no, let's not turn this into an argument about IETF process and what "should" be "experimental". _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
