Dear DANE WG, Olafur are at RIPE and had a chance to chat about this.
This WGLC has concluded. We think that we have enough review, and see consensus for publishing (after Viktor has had a chance to address the comments). We would have liked to get even more comments, but the document has had significant discussion over its lifecycle. Thank you for your feedback. W On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear DANE WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-dane-ops have indicated that they believe > that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group Last Call > (actually, they requested this a while back, we'd delayed while doing > toe other docs...) > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-ops/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > This WGLC ends Mon 11-May-2015. > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-dane-ops? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more > details.) > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as DANE WG co-chair) > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
