>I agree with all of that. If it is to be DNS, then hashing works >no worse than most other encodings.
As I'm fairly sure I described in detail before, base32 provides the option of reversing the encoding at the server, looking up the local part using whatever fuzzy matching the server wants to use, and sending an appropriate response. There's be no need to do any of the ill-advised local part guessing that people seem to think is required. You'd need a stunt server, but if you're publishing 100,000,000 keys, you're not going to use BIND. If you think that couldn't work, could you explain why not? R's, John _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
