I believe incursion into the lhs@ to define behaviour is very rare. This is a moment which bears thinking about, and will incur review overhead from people.
I'm in favour btw. But, (and I doubt anyone doesn't expect it) there will be questions to be asked about diving into lhs@ because its been very very uncommon. -G On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Colleagues > > > The sense of the room in the IETF-93 meeting was to do do a BASE32 > encoding of local part with 60 character labels, > shortest label is the left most label. > > If you can NOT live with this path forward now is your last chance to say > so. > > > By August 1'st the chairs will instruct editors how to proceed. > > Warren & Olafur > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > >
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
