On Thursday, July 30, 2015 08:31:02 AM Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Wiley, Glen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Was a decision taken to make the SMIMEA and OPENPGPKEY drafts experimental > > rather than standards track? — > > The chairs and AD’s are worried that Sandards track is a “bridge to far” at > this point. Thus going for experimental is simpler and quicker. > Document can be reclassified at later point once the experiment is a > success.
Based on previous experience, I think it's valuable to define, up front, what the experiment is and what success criteria are. What is the experiment that's being conducted? Scott K _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
