Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dane-ops-14: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-ops/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this. I only have some editorial comments, and others have beaten me to the punch on all save the following: -- Section 8, first paragraph: This section updates [RFC6698] by specifying a requirement on the TLSA Publisher to ensure that each combination of Certificate Usage, selector and matching type in the server's TLSA RRset MUST include at least one record that matches the server's current certificate chain. "Requirement on the ... publisher to ensure...that each combination... MUST include..." is sort of an odd construction for a 2119 MUST. Does the following capture the intent? NEW: This section updates [RFC6698] by specifying that the TLSA Publisher MUST ensure that each combination of Certificate Usage, selector and matching type in the server's TLSA RRset includes at least one record that matches the server's current certificate chain. END _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
