On 3/7/2016 4:46 AM, John Levine wrote:
In article <cahw9_ikvw4_kyw7gcoxrdnrhqvp9hxy9t8gk3h8fre-xewo...@mail.gmail.com>
you write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-
So, it seems that the primary authors of many our documents will not be
able to make it to Buenos Aires, and, we still have not received any call
for agenda items.
If you meet, I'd like to present draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00 but if you
don't meet, that's fine too.
I do not understand what exactly this draft offers over RFC 4387, which
already defines the HTTP certificate service, the URI formats, and the
SRV records. I get the vague sense that this draft is an alternative to
storing individual certificates in the DNS with DANE as
draft-ietf-dane-smime-10 proposes. (See Section 5 of this draft.)
That being said, it seems reasonable to present at the DANE meeting, so
I support that.
Sean
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
