I just marked it verified. S
On 08/08/16 15:07, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, RFC Errata System wrote: > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7929, >> "DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Bindings for OpenPGP". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7929&eid=4768 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: James Manger <[email protected]> >> >> Section: 5.3. >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> For example, if the OPENPGPKEY RR query for [email protected] >> (8d57[...]b7._openpgpkey.example.com) yields a CNAME to >> 8d57[...]b7._openpgpkey.example.net, and an OPENPGPKEY RR for >> 8d57[...]b7._openpgpkey.example.net exists, >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> For example, if the OPENPGPKEY RR query for [email protected] >> (c93f[...]d6._openpgpkey.example.com) yields a CNAME to >> c93f[...]d6._openpgpkey.example.net, and an OPENPGPKEY RR for >> c93f[...]d6._openpgpkey.example.net exists, >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The example hash 8d57[...]b7 is wrong. It has been calculated with the >> wrong hash algorithm: SHA-224, instead of SHA-256. The correct hash is >> c93f[...]d6, which is shown in the example in section 3. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > The errata is correct :/ > > Paul >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
