On 10 October 2016 at 15:35, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the record, in RFC7671, only DANE-EE(3) was in scope for skipping
> identity checks, no similar language is present for DANE-TA(2).

This is correct.  The draft goes into this in more detail, and is more
correct than my short announcement writeup.  Usage 2 is only a problem
if implemented incorrectly (and we have no evidence that this is the
case anywhere).

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to