> On Jun 16, 2018, at 7:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> This erratum should be rejected. RFC 4035 defines "indeterminate" in Section 
> 4.4.3.

(That'd be section 4.3, for anyone reading along).

> RFC 4035 and RFC 4033 define "indeterminate" differently.

Actually, the erratum is correct.  RFC7672 uses the definition
from "RFC4035", and the intent was to make it clear that the
definition of "indeterminate" from RFC4033 is not used.  Rather,
what 4033 calls "indeterminate", "7672" considers (more aptly)
"insecure".  The original text erroneously distanced itself from
4035 instead of 4033.

-- 
        Viktor.

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
dane@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to