Will wrote:
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
+exec c args "/dev/null" "/dev/null" =
+ system $ c++" "++careful_unwords args++" > NUL 2>&1"
I'm a little confused by this patch, but I'm by no means familiar with
Windows, so bear with me if I speak nonsense.
I didn't realise that Windows shells support the ``>&'' notation. Do
you know whether all versions do? Can you confirm whether this breaks
Windows 2000 and Windows 9x? If it does, do we care?
NT-based versions of Windows should support '>&', which includes
Windows 2000. I would guess that it doesn't work under Win9x, but
have no way to test.
Regards,
Will
Redirecting standard error is available only in the NT-derivatives.
Would just using "@echo off & (command)" work in this context?
http://www.robvanderwoude.com/redirection.html
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
