Hi,
Edwin Thomson recently submitted a bug report
(http://bugs.darcs.net/issue67) (Hi Edwin!). I fear the title of the bug
may be misleadingly light. We (Business Web Software) have an issue that
is giving us an apparently corrupt (and unusable) Darcs tree, and we
aren't sure that it isn't already corrupt. We are worried about doing
anything to the affected tree until the issue is traced, for fear of
breaking things further.
I just thought I'd point it out as being a tree-corruption bug, in case
that'll get it some more attention. We realise that the bug report isn't
as small as it could be, because we didn't have time to work out how to
excise irrelevant parts of the patch history, but we've tried to make it
at least manageable.
For reference, we are slowly switching over to Darcs (from CVS) for all
internal projects and very much appreciate Darcs for being the only
version control product that treats patches as the separate entities
that they are. So far, we have switched a 110,000-line product and a
60,000 line product and will be switching more, later. Also, we're
working on a version of TortoiseCVS that supports Darcs; we're already
using it internally and intend to release it (probably on SourceForge),
in the new year. We'll gladly assist, wherever possible, in resolving
this bug.
Any attention the bug could receive would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Grant Husbands.
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
