On 2006-01-08, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unlike what you have done until now, which was a clear improvement > with no change to the default user interface, this suggests changing > the default behaviour of darcs in a way that is culturally alien to > most people and incompatible with other revision control systems.
The current english date format is culturally alien to me, and probably most people in the world, and also very inconvenient to use as a filter. A fully numeric format is much less alien, and the ISO YYYY-MM-DD ordering is the sanest, because, well, its simple ordering. Next comes DD.MM.YYYY (which is the ordering used in this part of the world, and just the ISO ordering flipped), while YYYY/DD/MM or MM/DD/YYYY are just plain stupid. -- Tuomo _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
