New submission from Clive Crous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I have one project which is a branch of another.  I created a patch in the first
which removed a directory tree which both of them contain individually in
slightly modified states, this is what happened when I tried to pull the patch
from the 'root' repo downstream into the branch:

--

clive% darcs pull
Pulling from "../newt"...

Fri Feb 17 19:39:58 SAST 2006  Clive Crous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  * remove artifacts
Shall I pull this patch? (1/1) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y
darcs: bug in darcs!
in function reconcile_unwindings
Original patch:
merger 0.0 (
merger 0.0 (
hunk
./_artifacts/active/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
1
-2005-05-12 19:19:30 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] created
-2005-05-12 19:19:30 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] category bug
-2005-05-12 19:19:30 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] summary colouring for tty now
incorrect (los related)
-2005-05-12 19:19:30 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] assign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-2005-05-12 19:19:39 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] activated 13
-2005-06-19 12:15:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] note this is a lizard bug, it does
not affect newt and shouldn't be here
-2005-06-19 12:15:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] closed
merger 0.0 (
hunk
./_artifacts/active/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
6
+2005-06-19 12:15:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] note this is a lizard bug, it does
not affect newt and shouldn't be here
+2005-06-19 12:15:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] closed
hunk
./_artifacts/active/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
6
+2005-06-19 12:09:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] note fixed
+2005-06-19 12:09:42 UCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] closed
)
)
merger 0.0 (
merger 0.0 (
merger 0.0 (
move
./_artifacts/pending/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|feature|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|on\32\screen\32\indicator\32\for\32\when\32\monster\32\moves\32\are\32\busy,\32\hourglass\32\or\32\equivalent
./_artifacts/active/00000015|feature|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|on\32\screen\32\indicator\32\for\32\when\32\monster\32\moves\32\are\32\busy,\32\hourglass\32\or\32\equivalent
rmdir ./_artifacts/active
)
merger 0.0 (
move
./_artifacts/active/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
./_artifacts/closed/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
move
./_artifacts/active/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
./_artifacts/closed/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
)
)
rmfile
./_artifacts/closed/00000013|bug|[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]|colouring\32\for\32\tty\32\now\32\incorrect\32\(los\32\related)
)
)
Please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If possible include the output of 'darcs --exact-version'.

--

clive% darcs --exact-version
darcs compiled on Dec 24 2005, at 18:11:11
unknown

--

In my mind the above is completely useless as well. So:

clive% darcs --version
1.0.5 (release)

----------
messages: 496
nosy: clive, droundy, tommy
priority: urgent
status: unread
title: darcs crash on pull

____________________________________
Darcs issue tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue136>
____________________________________

_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to