On 3/1/06, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Adds target: api-doc. api-doc is generated by haddock > > This needs further discussion. Who of you would actually use > Haddock-generated docs if we decided to use Haddock markup? (I know I > wouldn't.)
I know I would, which is why I made the changes. > > > [Refactor lookInRepository/amInRepository > [...] > > +amInRepository [] = doInRepository "" $ const $ return $ Left $ > > + "You need to be in a repository > > directory" ++ > > + " to run this command." > > I'm sorry, but most people cannot parse that. Could you please > reformulate it in pointful style? I cannot find any coding style documents for darcs. How do I know that changes I make will be satisfactory? Futhermore, back when I made the changes I would have had time to correct this. I no longer have time. Perhaps someone else can change it to a more acceptable style assuming the haddock patch is accepted. Thanks, Jason _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
