> > > I can't really tell when patches are accepted. > > I've got the following patches of yours in my mailbox: > > - ``Do not reread freshly written patch when recording'', rejected > due to Ian's opposition (which I happen to disagree with, but he's > the better Haskell programmer); I'll accept this patch when you > convince Ian; > - three patches dated 14 Jan 2006, which I will push as soon as you > find a better name instead of ``--file'' (as I've mentioned, I like > ``--logfile'', but it's up to you, I'm only doing the complaining); > - ``Add -i as an alias for --interactive'', which should get in (I was > waiting for somebody to object, but nobody has for now).
The second and third one sound like patches from me, not Aaron. And while I'm here, I might as well comment on one of them. I am fine with using --logfile as long as people don't find it confusing. As I think I mentioned, it isn't really a logfile when used with send. But maybe reusing an option people already know is less confusing than moving things around. I don't really care either way, once I see the command in the help list I can manage. It could be --use-the-following-file-as-input-for-the-given-command. That's assuming DarcsArguments.lhs supports GNU very-long options. Anyway I believe I made the logfile->file rename as a separate patch, so you should be able to apply the rest of the patches and just leave off that one if you prefer --file. If you go to apply it and there are problems, drop me a note and I'll fix it. -- Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
