New submission from Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This message is an import of bug #251 from RT. In summary,
there are some cases with dependencies which don't work now with
'rollback'. They are solved by David Roundy's suggestion:
Actually, I think that rollback should be rewritten to generate an entirely
new patch, with a new patch name and comment. When a patch is rolled back, one
really ought to explain the reason why. This wouldn't be such a hard change,
it's just that I essentially never use rollback, so I don't tend to think about
it.
###
I agree with David's assessment and would like to this update to
'rollback' happen.
Mark
----------
messages: 614
nosy: droundy, markstos, tommy
status: unread
title: rollback should generate a new patch
____________________________________
Darcs issue tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue158>
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
