On somewhat related note... When you're doing a 'whatsnew -l' darcs gives up if there are any problems reading files. I'd like to change this so that instead darcs throws a warning to stderr but otherwise keeps going. Maybe in the final summary it could print a '?' in front of files which had read problems (for me this is commonly bad permissions).
Any objections? Thanks, Jason On 9/10/06, Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric, This should fix (1), (2) and (3) in your other email. I double checked the logic of checking for the summary flag in smart_diff and realized that unless someone figures out a way to do something like, 'darcs record --summary' then 'NoSummary' in Record.lhs is redundant. These changes are not as well tested as the previous incarnation. These changes do, of course, pass the test suite but have not been rigorously tested by using them day to day. On the other hand, the only real difference from the previous version is that 'NoSummary' is no longer passed redundantly. Thanks, Jason Sun Sep 10 12:38:03 PDT 2006 Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * whatsnew --look-for-adds doesn't read unadded files (fix for issue79) The default mode for whatsnew --look-for-adds is summary mode. In summary mode full patches are not needed. This fix changes whatsnew --look-for-adds to stop computing the full patch for a file when the file is not managed by darcs. _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
