On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:26:08 -0700, David Roundy wrote: > And I like to keep modules consisted in this respect, so older modules > should remain all_underscore, unless someone wants to refactor them > (which doesn't seem worth the effort).
So you would not object if somebody submitted patches that darcs replaced the underscore_using exported functions with camelCase equivalents... But would you object if somebody submitted a patch that made *all* functions camelCase? I understand it's less readable for you, but saying "all camelCase" seems somewhat easier to explain and implement than "camelCase only for things which we export" (which changes easily anyway). It seems like an all camelCase switch would make things marginally easier for newbies (I remember asking myself the question once...). Would it make things significantly harder for you? In any case, thanks for piping up about this! -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgpIr3atiHlqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
