New submission from Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you press `q' while selecting explicit deps, the patch is recorded
anyway.
$ darcs --version
1.0.8 (release)
$ darcs --exact-version
darcs compiled on Jul 4 2006, at 20:08:54
# configured Fri Jun 16 14:55:21 EDT 2006
./configure --no-create --no-recursion
Context:
[TAG 1.0.8
Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20060616160213]
$ darcs init
$ echo foo >foo
$ darcs add foo
$ darcs rec -am foo foo
Recording changes in "foo":
Finished recording patch 'foo'
$ echo bar >bar
$ darcs add bar
$ darcs rec -am bar --ask-deps bar
Recording changes in "bar":
Thu Nov 2 03:31:47 EST 2006 Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* foo
Shall I depend on this patch? (1/?) [ynWvpxqadjkc], or ? for help: q
Depend on cancelled.
Finished recording patch 'bar'
$ darcs cha
Thu Nov 2 03:32:09 EST 2006 Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* bar
Thu Nov 2 03:31:47 EST 2006 Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* foo
I expected that the whole record operation to be aborted.
Is this the expected behaviour? If so, what is the rationale for
behaving this way?
--
Trent Buck, Student Errant
----------
messages: 1164
nosy: EricKow, droundy, tommy, trentbuck
status: unread
title: Aborting --ask-deps does not abort the record
____________________________________
Darcs issue tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue329>
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
