New submission from simonpj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've just had a get_extra crash in an even simpler situation.
I have repository which I got with
darcs get --partial darcs.haskell.org/ghc
I recorded a one-line patch.
I tried to un-record it. Darcs crashed (output below).
This seems incomprehensible to me. I recorded that patch only *one* minute
ago! Why can't I un-record it? Surely it should be an invariant that you can
*always* unrecord if you have just recorded?
Simon
sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord
Mon Nov 13 12:32:05 GMT Standard Time 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Use implication constraints to improve type inference (part 2)
Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/277) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y
Fri Nov 10 13:31:23 GMT Standard Time 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Use implication constraints to improve type inference
Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/277) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d
darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra:
Fri Apr 7 11:18:39 GMT Daylight Time 2006 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes
We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that
finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black
hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test).
Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
sh-2.04$
----------
messages: 1210
nosy: EricKow, droundy, simonpj, tommy
status: unread
title: More pain with get_extra and partial repositories
____________________________________
Darcs issue tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue344>
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
