On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:07:59 +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > > [Amending a patch doesn't remove explicit dependencies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm going to accept this (thanks for fixing that!), but I agree with Tommy that we should try to keep our interfaces minimal. Another way might be just to replace infopatch by infodepspatch (perhaps using infopatch as a name). Infopatch doesn't seem to be used in many places, and perhaps being explicit about your deps (you know you're passing [] in) is a good idea. -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgp6FTJRG6twK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
