On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:06:19PM +0100, Eric Y. Kow wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 18:53:29 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Er, no. I was thinking of having a single global boolean for the > > specific purpose of Simon's flag. > > For what it's worth, this is how --disable-ssh-cm is implemented. > > Another option, maybe: how about using --verbose? This would still mean > passing [DarcsFlag] down, but at least we avoid introducing a new flag.
But we don't want this information for ordinary --verbose, because ordinary --verbose is used even when we don't want debugging information (e.g. darcs changes --verbose). We'd at a minimum need another level of logging besides normal, --quiet and --verbose, and I'd lean towards something like --debug. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
