On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:17:38PM +0100, Marnix Klooster wrote: > On 09-01-07 13:33, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > > >darcs send -o message --edit-description doesn't open text editor and ask > >for a > >description. It works as if --edit-description was not specified. darcs > >--edit-description works fine. > > I'm not sure whether or not --output + --edit-description should call an > editor or not. If not, then this combination should give an error > message. But it seems ok to allow opening an editor in this case.
I suspect we don't open the editor because normally the --output option doesn't format the output as an email (and this is probably an unintended side-effect), but I think we ought to do so. Not format it as an email, but format it like we format the email (i.e. add a description at top). > Assuming that we want to call the editor, attached is a patch that adds > a (currently failing) test for this scenario. Thanks for the patch! -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
