On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:22:58 +0000, Kirsten Chevalier wrote: > I assume it must be because I supplied a file list that I didn't get prompted > to > edit the long comment, and when I unrecorded the patch and re-recorded it with > --edit-long-comment, it worked, but this seems like a bug.
No. When you pass a patch name via -m, you don't get the option to put in a long comment. I think this behaviour is ok as-is. That said, there is a --prompt-long-comment switch, but this also gets ignored with -m. I think it would be fair to ask that --prompt-long-comment with -m give the behaviour you're expecting. -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgpwl7j3RcRlW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
