On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:53:52PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > > Tweaked as per David's suggestion (and helpful hint) > > > > Mon Mar 5 20:59:02 CET 2007 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Rename --disable-ssh-cm to --no-ssh-cm. > > > > This appears to be more consistent with other darcs flags. > > > > > > Mon Mar 5 21:07:52 CET 2007 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Flip ssh test to accept a --ssh-cm argument > > > > Mon Mar 5 21:47:55 CET 2007 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Add a --ssh-cm flag with --no-ssh-cm as the default. > > I would like to pull these into darcs-stable, but they depend on > the following patches: > > Sun Feb 4 19:13:01 CET 2007 Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Added --complement to pull to allow "exclusion" repos > > Tue Feb 6 07:52:36 CET 2007 Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Add pull_compl test; note interesting duplicate repo elimination in > docs. > > Sun Feb 25 12:32:16 CET 2007 Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Fix bash-ism `export foo=' in tests. > > and I don't want to pull any more features (like the complement > feature) into darcs-stable before the 1.0.9 release. Is it > possible to re-record the changes against darcs-stable instead?
I'd say that you can do that under your own initiative, and let Eric sort out the conflict. On the other hand, at least the bash-ism fix is safe, as it's only in the test suite, and is also sort of an "obvious" fix by an experienced developer (i.e. who knows shell). But I suppose the bash-ism fix itself depends on the patches that you don't want. I'd myself be comfortable with the --complement patches going into darcs-stable late, but I think that I'm more suited to -unstable branch development, and your discomfort with major changes probably indicates the wiser course. > In case anyone has wondered; I have been extremely occupied > lately, and will continue be so until at least end of April. I > won't be able to do much for darcs until then, but I do will try > to finish 1.0.9. I have a list of a few things that should be > sorted out first: 1) error message when faced with a hashed > repository 2) improved help text for Remove (work in progress, > but stalled), and some kind of improvements for the ssh-problems > (which I think these patches match). Good to hear! -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
