> Why Cabalisation? I'm not too sure. It does make it easy to > - express package dependencies (e.g., mtl, parsec, QuickCheck) > - expose a few modules and create a libdarcs > In fact, we might consider having two cabal files: one for libdarcs > and the other for darcs proper; might make the install process a > bit more complicated, however)
It's always nice to have programs using a standard packaging mechanism. I think this is a good idea. It might help package managers for Linux distributions, as well (although by now most of the major ones have already made a package for darcs). -- Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: gpg --recv-key 0xC9F82052 | http://divineinvasion.net/kapheine.asc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
