On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 18:37:49 +0100, Dave Love wrote: > I'm puzzled why the test should be in a separate patch. I expect the > code, doc, and tests for a change all to be in one patch(set); > otherwise it rather seems to defeat the object of patchsets. Anyway > I've split it, of course.
Actually, I'm not sure myself. Instinctively, I could see that it might be nice for the source to standalone from the tests, so you would still have changesets touching multiple files, just in certain discrete blocks. But it does also sound convincing to say that the tests really do go with the code and so should belong together. Being in doubt, I simply followed Juliusz's lead, thinking that (i) surely he has a good reason for this (ii) policy should be somewhat steady when changing maintainers. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.darcs.devel/3909 Sorry for the hassle. I hope I'm gettting less fussy and more thoughtful as I mature. -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgprOFSCzuuGq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
