Hi David, We're still failing tests here, namely $DARCS get --hashed-inventory temp3 temp5 in tests/hashed_inventory.sh
The issue seems to be that it cannot to retrieve one of the inventories. Anyway, I'd rather this code be in (and buggy) than not, so I'm going to accept all patches except for > Sun Apr 22 17:26:51 CEST 2007 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * add test to trigger yet another buggy case. I'll being looking at this some more tomorrow morning in case you're available to have a look. Otherwise, they're going in without the extra test. Note that when doing a strict get with --hashed-inventory, you do not get any feedback about patches being copied over, which can be quite distressing when copying big repositories. Is this an easy fix? Also, I'm playing around with this a little bit, and I noticed that with lazy repositories, unpulling one patch makes it retrieve all patches. Is that to be expected? In case, hey, this lazy repo stuff is pretty sweet! My hope is that people will have much fewer headaches working with lazy partial repos than they currently do with the strict partials. Out of curiosity, how hard do you think it would be to fix the strict partials, the "failed to read patch in get_extra" problems that people keep having? -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgpgP51ttsQmA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
