On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:29:16PM +0200, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > Looks like I need the 'optimize --reorder' bugfix in stable > after all (for issue494), so I've backported it. I may have > gotten it wrong. Especially I'm not sure if > > | IsEq <- invert x =\/= y = Just z > > is equivalent to > > | eq_patches (invert x) y = Just z > > And I omitted all the FL things although some of that stuff > already is in the stable repo. Do I miss out on some > optimization because of that? Then I could take a deeper look > and redo it.
I think this should be fine. > This also creates a five level deeply nested merger, which could > be a real killer (in the bad since of the word). Just try > Obliterate and say No to one of the patches, and watch darcs > spin... I'm not sure. I guess what to do would depend on how much we expect to change stable before merging with the experimental stuff. We could also do a branch that we don't expect to merge together ever again. :( -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
