Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > I know the variant with 2 repositories and pull/unpull. But I don't think it > is > very convenient. Instead I would like to just reverse apply all patches up to > X > to my workingcopy. This is in my opinion much more convenient than having to > copy around repositories.
I understand. Bzr has this feature, I think. Personally, I'm not keen on the idea, because it introduces new commands/flags into darcs. But I can also see that it might be very useful. If anybody wants to implement it, perhaps a good user interface for it would be to have a hide and unhide command, which would accept the same patch matching arguments as obliterate and pull respectively. Alternatively, we could also have some flags for obliterate and pull. > btw: obliterate is an alias to unpull. Why is it needed? I think it just > confuses to have too many commands (or aliases). Obliterate is the preferred name, deliberately chosen to be 'scary' because the user might lose information by using it recklessly. For what it's worth, the unpull command is now hidden in the current stable branch so that it no longer shows up in the help, or in autocompletion. __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/issue555> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
