On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:36:20AM -0700, zooko wrote: > > After all that I ran make test which failed 1 test > > rmdir.pl 1 256 34 1 2.94% 14 > > (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED). > > Although the resulting binary seems to run fine. I haven't been able > > to find out how serious that unexpected succeeded failure is, can you > > tell me? > > I can't. I get that too, although I've never run the tests until > just now.
I'm not sure about that test--and don't have time at the moment to look into it. Generally, I think that unexpected failure just means that we fixed a bug and failed to modify the test suite to take that into account. But I'm not sure. The perl side of the test suite is more powerful than the shell-script side, but I understand it far less. :( > Darcs devs: would there be any interest in running a BuildBot for > darcs? BuildBot is an excellent and widely used tool that runs unit > tests automatically (triggered by a darcs push, for example) on > various platforms. Yes, we would be interested in having such a system. It would be especially helpful if darcs developers were given accounts on at least some of the machines in the BuildBot cluster, particularly those weird platforms (e.g. Windows) that many of us don't otherwise have access to. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
