On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 00:11:50 -0000, David Roundy wrote: > When recording, the new code that announces that patches are skipped due to > dependencies sometimes gives false positives. To reproduce this, make > several independent changes to a file, run an interactive record and hit > 'f' on the first change. This should select all the changes, and does, but > you get a confusing message claiming some changes have been skipped due to > dependencies.
Hmm, that is indeed confusing. Is it just the messages that are at fault or is there a deeper rework of the code needed. I am guessing that what we really need are 4 different messages: - Skipping the next N patches as requested - Skipping the next N patches due to dependencies - Taking the next N patches as requested - Taking the next N patches due to dependencies -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgpuiFKviJDP2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
