* Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-05 02:58:35 +0300]: > > Also related to this idea: can we adjust the order of downloads in the > > queue? e.g. maybe I'd like to add a file towards the front of the queue > > because I need it right now. This might be doable if waitForURL could bump > > up the priority of that URL, in case it hasn't yet been requested from the > > server. > Implementing priority is more difficult. There is no priority support > in curl AFAIK. Maybe there is priority in libwww but I do not think
Wouldn't the use of pipelining mean that all of the requests should have already been sent? > Regarding the priority. Maybe we can get what something like this with > a second connection to the server? One connection for high priority This doesn't seem like a completely awful idea, but there should probably be a way to disable this, as some HTTP servers do not want to accept more than one connection at a time from the same source (among other potential problems). -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
